Black wave-style dial · black grooved strap · sample dimensions and weight pictured
Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 210.32.42.20.01.001 Replica Watch
This Omega Seamaster replica follows the black rubber-strap direction of reference 210.32.42.20.01.001. Ten still photographs show the dial, bezel, date, strap, side profile, decorated back, two calliper states, immediate luminous-style response, scale display and presentation scene. The retained video was not watched.
The visible numbers are useful only when their measurement limits stay attached
The roughly 15.6 mm display follows a thickness-like direction; the roughly 50.5 mm span is too oblique to call diameter or lug-to-lug; and about 84 g belongs only to the pictured black-strap configuration. Packaging and receipt-like props do not prove authenticity, value, warranty or inclusion.
Evidence boundary
OMEGA's official specifications describe the genuine reference. The photographs describe this sample and its pictured state. Similar colour, markings, geometry or decoration cannot prove authentic materials, calibre, certification, purchase history or performance.
Official genuine context
42 mm · 49.90 mm · about 109 g
OMEGA also lists 13.56 mm thickness, 20 mm between lugs, Calibre 8800, 55 hours and 30 bar for the genuine reference.
Pictured sample
About 15.6 mm and 84 g
One thickness-direction calliper image and one complete black-strap scale state provide useful but unrepeated sample evidence.
Important boundary
50.5 mm axis is ambiguous
The angled calliper image should not be called standard diameter or lug-to-lug; both measurements still need controlled views.
A useful omega seamaster super clone comparison preserves the measurement axis, strap configuration, calibration limits and official-versus-sample boundary instead of turning isolated numbers into blanket quality claims.
Six supporting photo groups
Presentation Scene, Front Detail, Case Profile and Decorated Back
The remaining six photographs establish visual details and make clear which package, material and functional questions still need exact-unit proof.
Presentation scene is not purchase proof
A box, bag, booklet/card and receipt-like sheet are visible around the watch. The HKD amount and contact-style details do not prove authenticity, original purchase, current value, warranty or shipment contents.
Black date-equipped dial direction
The wave-pattern-style dial, black bezel, red text/seconds tip and six-o'clock date 12 are clear. Ceramic, enamel, applied material, alignment under neutral light and full date operation remain unproven.
Crown-side case profile
Case layers, crown guards, polished/brushed transitions and strap connection are visible. Crown threading, winding, setting positions, gasket condition and buckle security need a continuous demonstration.
Decorated transparent back
An automatic-looking movement, balance area, striped decoration and multiple 8800-/Diver-style inscriptions are visible. Appearance cannot identify calibre, certification, accuracy, parts or reserve.
Ambiguous outside span
The display is readable, but the watch angle and endpoints prevent a standard diameter or lug-to-lug label. Repeat all axes with zero visible and the jaws clearly positioned.
Movement close-up adds inspection detail
The second back view helps inspect the rotor, balance region, decoration and text consistency. It still does not provide an installed-movement certificate, timing positions, reserve test or service evidence.
Model-linked media retained
Native MP4 Retained Without Borrowing Unseen Claims
The 43,312,254-byte MP4 passed HTTP Range delivery with status 206. It was not watched, so it adds no evidence for bezel clicks, crown/date action, valve function, strap or buckle operation, timing, lume decay, pressure resistance or package contents. Use a fresh exact-unit clip for those checks.
Photo-based evidence chain
What the Archive Shows and What Final QC Must Add
Confirmed by still photos
Black wave-pattern-style dial/bezel, red accents, six-o'clock date 12, black grooved strap, steel-tone case, exterior controls, decorated transparent back, about 15.6 mm thickness-direction display, about 50.5 mm ambiguous span, immediate lume-style response, about 84 g scale state and presentation props.
Not confirmed
Factory, origin, ceramic, enamel, sapphire, steel/rubber grade, authentic packaging or receipt, standard diameter, clean lug-to-lug, Calibre 8800, certification, accuracy, reserve, timed lume endurance, control function, pressure resistance or exact included accessories.
Best next request
One cut-free film-free sequence tying the exact dial, date, back and strap to zeroed dimensions/weight, bezel, crown, valve, calendar, buckle, multi-position timing, later-reserve timing, lume decay, any agreed pressure result and a complete package inventory.
Omega replica watch buyer guide
210.32.42.20.01.001: Black Strap Configuration, Measurements and Exact-Unit QC
The listing and stills point to the same black rubber-strap direction
Reference 210.32.42.20.01.001 is the black date-equipped Diver 300M on a black strap. The sample shows a black wave-pattern-style dial, black diving bezel, red accents, date at six, steel-tone case, black grooved strap, exterior controls and a transparent back. That is visual alignment, not authentication.
Keep official dimensions in a separate genuine-reference column
The OMEGA reference page lists 42 mm diameter, 49.90 mm lug-to-lug, 13.56 mm thickness, 20 mm between lugs and approximately 109 g. It also lists steel, sapphire, Calibre 8800, 55 hours and 30 bar for the genuine watch only.
The sample thickness display deserves a controlled repeat
One photograph shows about 15.6 mm along a thickness-like direction, around 2.0 mm above the genuine reference's published 13.56 mm. Film, jaw contact and zero calibration remain unknown. Ask for a film-free side-on reading that clearly touches crystal and caseback at their highest points.
Do not rename the ambiguous 50.5 mm span
The other calliper display is about 50.5 mm, but the watch is angled and the endpoints do not establish a standard axis. It should remain an ambiguous outside span. Final QC should separately record crown-excluded diameter, maximum width across controls, lug-to-lug and thickness.
The scale display is configuration-specific
The complete black-strap watch is pictured at about 84 g. OMEGA lists approximately 109 g for the genuine reference, a difference of about 25 g. Strap and buckle construction, scale zero, film and internal build are uncontrolled, so weight cannot certify material or authenticity.
Black colour and wave styling are visible; ceramic is not
The dial and bezel appear black, with pale wave-style lines and a white diving scale. OMEGA describes polished black ceramic, laser engraving and white enamel for the genuine watch. The sample stills establish appearance only, not chemistry, hardness, engraving method or enamel composition.
The date layout is clear but the calendar mechanism is untested
The six-o'clock window displays 12 in the front views. A still cannot show alignment across all numerals, quickset behaviour, crown positions or the midnight transition. Request one uncut sequence setting the date away from the danger zone and recording a complete change.
Immediate lume response is not a timed endurance result
The illuminated view shows green-looking markers and blue-looking hands and bezel points. It does not document the light source, charge duration, darkness, exposure or decay. A useful comparison uses the same camera settings immediately after charging and after one, five and fifteen minutes.
The black strap is installed, but its composition and buckle still need proof
The grooved strap is shown on the assembled watch, including its underside near the transparent back. OMEGA specifies rubber and a steel pin buckle for the genuine reference. For the sample, request inner/outer surface close-ups, both lengths, 20 mm interface, flexing, buckle stamps and repeated fastening.
Decorated movement appearance cannot identify Calibre 8800
The wave-edged transparent back exposes an automatic-looking decorated movement with 8800-style text and a visible balance area. Decoration does not establish architecture, certification, parts, accuracy, serviceability or reserve. Obtain an installed-movement disclosure and test the exact unit.
Front alignment needs a film-free neutral-light view
A straight-on image can reveal wave spacing, applied-index placement, minute-track printing, date centering, hand clearances and bezel return to twelve. Reflections and protective surfaces remain. Request a level daylight-balanced frame after film removal plus a full bezel rotation ending at twelve.
Crown, valve and bezel functions need one continuous clip
The photos show the right crown and left conical-valve-style control but not threading, winding, time/date setting, valve action, bezel clicks or sealing. Ask for a cut-free sequence that operates every control and returns the watch to a documented final state.
Diver markings are not sample pressure evidence
OMEGA lists 30 bar for the genuine reference. Diver 300M- and 300m/1000ft-style text on a replica does not prove sealing. If water use matters, write down exact pressure, hold time, equipment, leak criteria and post-test crown/date/bezel checks before the test.
Presentation props must be separated from purchase proof
The opening scene includes a box, bag, cards/booklet and a receipt-like sheet showing an HKD amount and contact-style details. Those objects can help identify the photographed scene, but they do not establish authenticity, value, warranty, seller identity, original purchase or shipment contents.
Search intent should lead to measurable evidence
omega copy watch, omega super clone, omega seamaster super clone, omega seamaster replica and high quality omega replica watches are discovery phrases from the supplied workbook. Here they lead to an exact black configuration, the pictured readings and a repeatable QC checklist instead of an unsupported grade label.
The retained MP4 is available without borrowing unseen claims
The 43,312,254-byte product video passed a 206 byte-range response and remains embedded, but it was not watched. No claim about bezel sound, threading, date action, valve operation, strap feel, timing, lume decay, package contents or pressure is drawn from unseen footage.
Compare nearby models by colour, date and wearing system
Choose the green 210.30.42.20.10.001 listing for a vivid steel-bracelet alternative, the white 210.30.42.20.04.001 listing for stronger dial contrast on steel, or the black/orange no-date 210.30.42.20.01.018 listing for mesh-bracelet construction and a cleaner lower dial. Verify each linked sample independently.
Tie every accepted result to one physical watch
Fresh QC should keep the dial, displayed date, back, strap and visible marks continuously identifiable while showing zeroed dimensions, weight, bezel/crown/date/valve operation, multi-position timing, later-reserve timing, lume decay and any agreed pressure test. Restart the identity chain after any unit swap.
Write package and performance terms into the order record
Record the black dial/bezel/strap configuration, exact box/card/booklet contents if wanted, wrist size, installed movement, current price, accepted dimension/timing tolerances and water-use limits. Pay the balance only after the same exact unit meets the written checklist.
Use differences to ask better questions, not to declare a verdict
The sample's pictured 15.6 mm thickness-direction display and 84 g weight differ from OMEGA's published 13.56 mm and 109 g. Those gaps make repeat measurements important, but do not by themselves explain caseback geometry, strap construction, scale accuracy or the movement inside.
Related model comparisons
Three Diver 300M Alternatives with Clear Visual Differences
Compare colour, date layout and bracelet architecture first, then review each linked page's own media and sample evidence.
Green steel alternative
Seamaster 210.30.42.20.10.001
Choose the green date-equipped direction for a more vivid dial/bezel combination and the weight and feel of a steel-tone bracelet.
White steel alternative
Seamaster 210.30.42.20.04.001
The white dial and black bezel produce stronger marker/hand contrast while retaining the date and steel-bracelet layout.
No-date mesh alternative
Seamaster 210.30.42.20.01.018
Use the black/orange no-date page when mesh-bracelet construction and a cleaner lower dial matter more than this black-strap date configuration.
How Time-mimic Should Handle Your 210.32.42.20.01.001 Inquiry
The black configuration and several sample readings are visible. The order still needs controlled measurement axes, repeatable performance checks and a written list of presentation items rather than assumptions from the opening photograph.
1 · Lock the exact configuration
Record black dial/bezel, black strap and buckle, wrist size, requested box/card/booklet contents and current US$567 price.
2 · Keep one identity chain
Use the dial, date, transparent back and visible strap details to connect clean measurements, controls and tests to one physical unit.
3 · Repeat and expand the evidence
Add standard dimensions, confirmed final-configuration weight, bezel/crown/date/valve/buckle operation, multi-position timing, reserve, timed lume and any agreed pressure test.
After-sales protection
Warranty & Shipping
Every watch includes daily maintenance tools, a 365-day free warranty, replacement within 30 days for confirmed quality problems, and replacement for a shipment confirmed lost in transit. Confirm written coverage for the movement, crown, date, bezel, valve, strap, buckle, requested presentation items and any agreed pressure result.
Flexible options
Deposit, QC & Final Payment
After the configuration, sample evidence and requested tests are written down, a US$20 deposit starts sourcing and QC. Pay the remaining balance only after fresh media connects every approved detail to one physical watch.
- 1. Confirm the exact reference, visible configuration and wrist sizing
- 2. Confirm $567 and pay US$20 deposit to start sourcing/QC
- 3. Review fresh measurements, controls, movement, timing, reserve and requested tests
- 4. Pay balance only after exact-unit approval; then shipment begins
Black dial, measurements, weight, packaging and order questions
Omega Seamaster 210.32.42.20.01.001 Replica Watch FAQ
Do the photographs match reference 210.32.42.20.01.001?
They follow that black rubber-strap Diver 300M direction: black wave-pattern-style dial and bezel, six-o'clock date, steel-tone case, black grooved strap, conical-valve-style control and transparent decorated back. This supports configuration identification, but it does not authenticate the sample or prove ceramic, sapphire, steel grade, rubber composition or movement identity.
What do the ten still photographs actually confirm?
They confirm the black/date/rubber-strap appearance, side profile, decorated transparent back, roughly 15.6 mm thickness-direction display, roughly 50.5 mm ambiguous outside span, immediate lume-style response, about 84 g scale display and a presentation scene. Each reading belongs only to the photographed state.
Is the 50.5 mm calliper reading the case diameter or lug-to-lug?
Neither label is safe from this image. The calliper is held on an oblique outside span and its endpoints are not clear enough to establish a standard measurement axis. Request separate zeroed views for case diameter without crown, lug-to-lug, thickness and the maximum control-to-control width.
How should the 15.6 mm thickness reading be interpreted?
The jaws appear to follow a thickness direction, so it is useful sample evidence, but protective film, exact jaw contact and zero calibration are not shown. OMEGA lists 13.56 mm for the genuine reference, making the photographed display about 2.0 mm higher; that comparison does not identify materials or internal construction.
Does the 84 g scale display prove the official 109 g construction?
No. The pictured black-strap sample is displayed at about 84 g, while OMEGA lists approximately 109 g for the genuine reference. The roughly 25 g difference is a comparison point only because strap/buckle construction, scale zero, protective film and internal parts are uncontrolled.
Does the illuminated dial prove lasting lume?
No. The image shows immediate green-looking markers and blue-looking hands and bezel points while a light is directed at the dial. It does not show charge time, camera exposure, colour after the light is removed or decay. Ask for matched images at zero, one, five and fifteen minutes.
Do the transparent-back markings prove Calibre 8800?
No. The photographs show a decorated automatic-looking movement with 8800-style inscriptions. Calibre 8800 is the genuine-reference specification. The sample needs a written installed-movement disclosure, service route, several timing positions and a measured power-reserve test.
Is this replica proven water resistant to 300 metres?
No. Diver 300M-style wording is visible, but the sample archive contains no pressure-test result. OMEGA's 30 bar rating applies to the genuine watch. Agree on test pressure, unit, equipment, hold duration, pass criteria and post-test checks before payment or water exposure.
Do the box, cards and receipt-like paper prove authenticity or inclusion?
No. They are props visible in one scene. The receipt-like sheet includes an HKD 68,000-style amount and contact/address-style text, but a photograph cannot connect those details to an authentic purchase, current value, warranty or the shipment. Confirm every included item in writing.
Was the retained product video watched for this rewrite?
No. The 43,312,254-byte MP4 remains attached and passed HTTP Range delivery with status 206. All claims in this draft come from the ten inspected still photographs. Request a fresh continuous exact-unit video for controls, measurements, tests and package contents.